Saturday, February 04, 2006

Homophobic protest

Would you believe this? Fred Phelps, the rabid anti-gay pastor of Westboro Baptist Church in Kansas is picketing Coretta Scott King's funeral because of her support of gay rights. I'm linking here to their flyer about the event but be warned: the sheer hatred of it will take your breath away. Here's part of what it says:

WBC has warned Mrs. King for more than 10 years that by endorsing the homosexual agenda she was bringing down the wrath of God upon herself, her family and the black civil rights movement. She is an ingrate -- unthankful and unholy.


And that's the least virulent part. Go read the rest of it - if you have the stomach for it.

About Boehner

Go on over to Common Dreams and read an article from The Nation entitled, "A Boehner in the Henhouse" by John Nichols.

Newly-selected House Majority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, is getting some remarkably good press, considering his remarkably sordid political pedigree.

ABC News referred to the grizzled veteran of Capitol Hill, who was elected to the House when George Bush the Dad was president and Democrat Tom Foley was the Speaker of the House, as a "fresh face." The network's report on the House Republican Caucus vote to select a replacement for the indicted Tom DeLay was headlined: "New Leader, Ohio Rep. John Boehner, Campaigned as a Reformer."

The Los Angeles Times announced, with no apparent sense of irony, that: "By choosing Boehner to fill DeLay's shoes in the House, the party hopes to move past scandals."

Newsday just went for it, declaring above its report on Boehner's election: "A promise of reform wins vote."

As they say in the newsroom: Don't believe everything you read in the headlines.

Boehner is an old-fashioned shakedown artist whose promise of "change" amounts to little more than a pledge that he won't get caught like DeLay did. The Ohioan may be smoother than the Texan, but only a fool, or a Washington pundit looking to cozy up to the new boss, would mistake a better haircut and the absence of the stench of bug spray as evidence of ethics.

The best take on Boehner's elevation to the top of the Congressional food chain comes not from the Washington press corps but from one of the city's more watchdogs: Public Citizen President Joan Claybrook.

Referring to Boehner victory over the presumed favorite, Majority Whip Roy Blunt, R-Missoui, in the House leadership contest as "a selection of Tweedle Dum over Tweedle Dee," Claybrook explained that, "The rejection of Representative Blunt shows that rank-and-file Republicans are aware the corruption scandal that has shaken Washington could put their majority status at risk. But the elevation of Representative Boehner, himself a product and proponent of the systemic problem of cronyism and influence-peddling that afflicts our nation's capital, is not a sign that business as usual will end."


Yeah, well who seriously thought that business as usual would end? Who serioiusly thinks it will ever end with this administration. Raw power is all they understand and without being made to behave, they won't.

Friday, February 03, 2006

Old cat killer Frist

What can I say? PETA has balls. Look at this:

WASHINGTON, Dec. 31 (UPI) -- Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., is being asked by an animal advocacy group to support legislation for better animal treatment to make up for fraudulently adopting cats from animal shelters then experimenting on and killing them while he was a medical student.

A Dec. 31 letter from the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals asked Frist to make amends by pressing for reforms that would replace old-style tests where animals are subjected to painful and sometimes deadly procedures with newer, more humane approaches. They also requested that he help fund research to find non-animal alternatives.

Frist acknowledged in a 1989 book that he routinely killed cats while an ambitious medical student at Harvard Medical School in the 1970s. His office said it had no record on how many cats died. Frist disclosed that he went to animal shelters and pretended to adopt the cats, telling shelter personnel he intended to keep them as pets. Instead he used them to sharpen his surgical skills, killing them in the process.


Good for PETA! I'm proud to give them a monthly pledge and I encourage you all to consider making a contribution.

I'll tell you what I think. I think it would be poetic justice if Frist came back as a cat in his next life. With his memories intact.

Sickening, just sickening

I simply do not understand how this man can stay in office. Why aren't the American people outraged enough to toss him out? Look at this from an article in the Independent:

George Bush considered provoking a war with Saddam Hussein's regime by flying a United States spyplane over Iraq bearing UN colours, enticing the Iraqis to take a shot at it, according to a leaked memo of a meeting between the US President and Tony Blair.

The two leaders were worried by the lack of hard evidence that Saddam Hussein had broken UN resolutions, though privately they were convinced that he had. According to the memorandum, Mr Bush said: "The US was thinking of flying U2 reconnaissance aircraft with fighter cover over Iraq, painted in UN colours. If Saddam fired on them, he would be in breach."

He added: "It was also possible that a defector could be brought out who would give a public presentation about Saddam's WMD, and there was also a small possibility that Saddam would be assassinated." The memo damningly suggests the decision to invade Iraq had already been made when Mr Blair and the US President met in Washington on 31 January 2003 ­ when the British Government was still working on obtaining a second UN resolution to legitimise the conflict.


I'm weary. I think I'll just leave that without further comment. Make your own, if you like, in the comments section.

Who REALLY threatens marriage?

The answer is in the title: "It's straight people who threaten marriage". Here's an excerpt:

The more remarkable thing, too, is that the one place in the United States where same-sex marriage IS allowed, is also the state where traditional marriage is the strongest.

Yes, it is Massachusetts, the home to uber-liberals John Kerry and Ted Kennedy, of latte-sipping, anything-goes commie liberalism.

Yes, Massachusetts - the state where more than 7,300 gay couples have married in less than two years, or since they were allowed by law - has the lowest divorce rate in the nation.


Read the rest of the article if you're so inclined. Some interesting statistics there. And, by the way, it's the "born again" crowd that has the highest divorce rate in Colorada where the article was written.

Friday cat blogging!

Leroy:

Image hosting by Photobucket
Photo by Ellie Finlay

All politics - no policy

AMERICAblog is kind enough to bring us the tail end of Paul Krugman's recent column. I'm going to quote the final two paragraphs here:

John DiIulio, the former White House head of faith-based policy, explained it more than three years ago. He told the reporter Ron Suskind how this administration operates: "There is no precedent in any modern White House for what is going on in this one: a complete lack of a policy apparatus. ... I heard many, many staff discussions but not three meaningful, substantive policy discussions. There were no actual policy white papers on domestic issues."

In other words, this administration is all politics and no policy. It knows how to attain power, but has no idea how to govern. That's why the administration was caught unaware when Katrina hit, and why it was totally unprepared for the predictable problems with its drug plan. It's why Mr. Bush announced an energy plan with no substance behind it. And it's why the state of the union — the thing itself, not the speech — is so grim.


They seem to have no interest in governing. In fact, they don't believe in government. As Grover Norquist put it, they want to dismantle government so that it is small enough to "drown in the bathtub". The domestic part, that is. They're happy for the military part to be huge.

Thursday, February 02, 2006

Sound bite for Democrats

I found this on AMERICAblog:

PERMANENT TAX CUTS MEANS PERMANENT DEBT.


But do the Republicans care? No, they're making it so the wealthy won't have to pay taxes and therefore paying back the debt will be the responsibility of the poor and middle class.

Those T-shirts

By now surely you know that Cindy Sheehan was arrested just before the State of the Union address began for wearing a T-shirt that stated the number of American deaths in the Iraq war. What may have escaped your attention is that another woman, a Republican wearing a "support the troops" T-shirt, was also required to leave the House chamber. The big difference is that the Republican was not arrested or roughed up the way Cindy Sheehan was. John Nichols discusses this in his opinion piece in the Nation called, "The War on T-Shirts" :

Is there really a law against wearing a political T-shirt to the State of the Union address?

No.

The Capitol Police, who on Wednesday dropped the charges against Sheehan, have acknowledged in an official statement that: "While officers acted in a manner consistent with the rules of decorum enforced by the department in the House Gallery for years, neither Mrs. Sheehan's manner of dress or initial conduct warranted law enforcement intervention."

What they have not acknowledged, and what is truly troubling, is the evidence that Sheehan was singled out for rough justice.

Beverly Young, the wife of Representative C.W. Bill Young, a Florida Republican who chairs the House Defense Appropriations subcommittee, showed for the State of the Union address up sporting a T-shirt that read, "Support the Troops--Defending Our Freedom." When Capitol Police asked her to leave the gallery because she was wearing clothing that featured a political message, Mrs. Young says, she argued loudly with officers and called one of them "an idiot."

But Mrs. Young was not handcuffed. She was not dragged from the Capitol. She was not arrested. She was not jailed.

Sheehan, who caused no ruckus, was arrested not because she engaged in "unlawful conduct." Rather, by every evidence, she was arrested because of what her T-shirt said--and, by extension, because of what she believes.


So now we're moving toward having thought crimes in this country. Think about it. This is very, very disturbing.

Wednesday, February 01, 2006

There can be no doubt that the United States has become the biggest bully on the block, a true terrorist, the likes of which the world has never seen, an accomplishment for which our president seems to be extremely proud.

-- Doug Soderstrom

The Federal budget

This is great! True Majority just sent out a link to a great animation that explains the federal budget in a way that even I can understand. Here's the link. Click through and watch it. It only takes a few minutes and will give you amazing clarity about our priorities as a nation.

The SOTU address

Just maybe some of you are like me and can't stand to hear Bush's voice or look at him more than a few seconds. So, needless to say, I didn't watch the State of the Union speech last night. What I did was follow something known as "live-blogging" during which other brave souls watched and made running comments. So I do know that the president mentioned 9/11 about 30 seconds into his remarks. (Heck, I'm surprised it took him that long).

Anyway, if you want to know exactly what he said, AMERICAblog posted the text of the entire speech right here.

Who's the real terrorist here?

I just want to bring you one brief observation noted in an article called, "In realm of political illusion, the world's a stage" by Gene Lyons:

The purpose of terrorism is to induce irrational, disabling fear. In this sense, comments the brilliant blogger Digby at digbysblog. blogspot. com, "Al Qaeda has a powerful ally... the Bush administration, which for four years has... worked ceaselessly to instill in Americans an overarching and excessive fear of terrorism."


Who has most to gain from inducing "irrational, disabling fear" in the American people? And it's worked. Why else are we selling our birthright of freedom for the illusion of security?

Tuesday, January 31, 2006

The real problem

Here's another reason I've decided to cancel my pledge to the Democratic Party. The party leadership is not speaking out on the subject of election reform. Here's an excerpt from an article by Bernard Weiner called "Reforming the Democrats — or a third party?":

[O]ur current voting system is a corrupted mess. It outsources ballot-counting to private corporations with secret software easily open to manipulation from the companies that own the e-voting machines and vote-counting computers, or to hacking from without. Those corporations are Republican-supporters at present, and key recent elections probably were fiddled with, according to scholars and other experts who have examined the shoddy system. If we can't overhaul the current manner of voting and ballot-counting, taking corruption and partisanship out of it, it won't matter how clean and transparent and dynamic our refurbished party is. We'll still continue to "lose," even when we win.


What good is it going to do to fund campaigns if the Republicans are going to keep stealing elections and we're too cowed to call them on it?
I appreciate this:


People might laugh at Cindy Sheehan and Harry Belafonte, but at least they fight.

-- comment off of Eschaton

Hall of shame

Here are the Democrats who voted against the filibuster yesterday:

Akaka (D-HI)
Baucus (D-MT)
Bingaman (D-NM)
Byrd (D-WV)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Carper (D-DE)
Conrad (D-ND)
Dorgan(D-ND)
Inouye (D-HI)
Johnson (D-SD)
Kohl (D-WI)
Landrieu (D-LA)
Lieberman (D-CT)
Lincoln (D-AR)
Nelson (D-FL)
Nelson (D-NE)
Pryor (D-AR)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Salazar (D-CO)

Our problem is we have no party discipline. The Republicans would never have broken ranks like that. The Republicans needed 60 votes to prevent a the filibuster. What they got was 72. That is simply shameful. If all 19 Democrats above had demonstrated a little party loyalty, the Republicans would have had only 53 votes and then we would have seen a real fight to keep Alito off the Supreme Court. As it is, you can kiss your freedoms good-bye. Alito is the man who does not support a woman's right to privacy on reproductive matters, who believes it's fine to strip search a 10 year old girl, who supports big corporations over the rights of the little person, and, worst of all, who supports that odious doctrine known as the "unitary executive" which essentially gives dictatorial powers to the president. Yesterday was a sad, sad day for the Republic. In fact, many on the internet are saying that, as of Jan. 30, 2006, the Republic is no more.

UPDATE: I just got off the phone with the Democratic Party. I cancelled my monthly pledge saying that the Democrats are going to have to show some spine if they want to keep their base loyal and energized. I'm not giving one more dime to the party until the people representing us learn how to fight. If keeping Alito off the Supreme Court is not worth fighting for, I don't know what is.

Monday, January 30, 2006

The World Can't Wait

I want to call your attention to the World Can't Wait movement. It is endorsed by such notables as Martin Sheen, Cindy Sheehan, Gloria Steinem, Gore Vidal, Howard Zinn, Kurt Vonnegut, Al Sharpton, Mark Crispin Miller, Harold Pinter and many more. There's a nation wide protest planned for tomorrow night during the State of the Union address. Everyone is urged to bring noise makers to symbolically drown out the sound of Bush making his speech. Yes, there is a protest right here in Tulsa for you locals out there. Here is the Tulsa website for the movement. And the details of the protest are as follows:

This event will be in front of KJRH channel 2.
3701 South Peoria, Tulsa
Gather and rally at 7:30pm, protesting begins at 8pm, the scheduled time for Bush's address speech.
There is plenty of parking just south of Ch 2 in the Old Village Cleaners parking lot.

Tulsa Can't Wait consists of individuals from Tulsa and the surrounding areas that want to make a difference. Our current goal is for Bush to step down, "BUSH STEP DOWN, AND TAKE HIS WHOLE PROGRAM WITH HIM!" On November 2, the birth of our movement, we had over 50 people for our FIRST protest. Groups included TULSAPEACE.ORG, JUSTPROGRESS.ORG, VETERANSFORPEACE.ORG, Democrats of OK, Jenks High School, and many others! Please make sure to look over our GET INVOLVED link so you too can help by sharing ideas and thoughts.

Amazing that this movement exists in this reddest of states, in the buckle of the Bible Belt. Definitely worth finding out more about this organization and lending the movement our support.

Blair is waking up

Well, at least the Prime Minister of Britain is finally sounding the alarm regarding global warming. The article is from The Guardian and it's entitled, "PM issues blunt warning on climate change". Here's part of what it says:

Tony Blair warns that the impact of climate change may be more serious than previously thought in a new government report on global warming published today.

The report raises fears that both the Antarctic and Greenland ice sheets are likely to melt, leading to a devastating rise in sea levels.

It warns of large-scale and irreversible disruption if temperatures rise by more than 3C (5.4F) - well within the range of climate change projections for the century.

Avoiding Dangerous Climate Change is published as a book and collates evidence presented by scientists at a conference hosted by the UK Meteorological Office last
February.

The conference predicted that greenhouse gases would raise global temperatures by between 1.4C and 5.8C over this century.

"It is clear from the work presented that the risks of climate change may well be greater than we thought," Mr Blair wrote in the forward to the book.

"It is now plain that the emission of greenhouse gases, associated with industrialisation and economic growth from a world population that has increased six-fold in 200 years, is causing global warming at a rate that is unsustainable."

The book includes concerns expressed by the head of the British Antarctic Survey, Professor Chris Rapley, that the huge West Antarctic ice sheet may be starting to disintegrate.

Scientists believe such an event would raise sea levels around the world by almost 5m (16 ft).

Prof Rapley writes that a previous report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change dismissing worries about the ice sheet's stability had to be revised: "The last IPCC report characterised Antarctica as a slumbering giant in terms of climate change. I would say it is now an awakened giant. There is real concern."


"There is real concern." Well, that's putting it mildly. We ought not to be merely concerned. We ought to be absolutely terrified.

Now the question is, will Tony Blair try to talk some sense into George Bush? And if he did, would it do any good? I'm not optimistic.

UPDATE: All right, this is disgusting. CNN picked up the above story and published it on its International Edition web page in an article entitled, "Climate risk 'worse than thought'". It is nowhere to be found - I mean nowhere - on the U.S. Edition. Don't even try to tell me that's not bias.

Sunday, January 29, 2006

This sums it up

Here's a comment off of AMERICAblog by a guy named Vince. Couldn't have said it better myself:

Okay. The permafrost in Alaska is melting, causing landslides, roads to cave in, etc... New insects are appearing that did not used to live that far north, and the ecosystem is under siege. The northern forests are facing diseases that the trees have no immunity to. The glaciers and polar ice caps are disappearing, resulting in a danger to polar bears, penguins, and many other species. The North Atlantic current is starting to fail, and the result is one of the coldest and snowiest winters in Europe in a VERY long time. I live in Iowa, and we have been having rain and 40's in January, which used to be unheard of. Anyone who does not believe in Global warming, or who wants to cover it up, must want the massive extinctions that are around the corner come to pass.


And Bush is trying to silence scientists. For the life of me, I do NOT understand the right-wing death wish.

Beyond the whispered fascism

We must disenthrall ourselves from the idea that our institutions, our traditions, the barriers that protect us from absolute and authoritarian powers, cannot be broken down. They are being dismantled a brick at a time. The separation of powers has already been annihilated. It is a whispered fascism, not yet marching down your street or pounding upon your door in the dead of night. But it is here, and it is laying deep roots. We must listen beyond the whispered fascism of today to the shouted fascism of tomorrow. We must look beyond the lies and the myths, beyond the dogmas by which we sleep.

- William Rivers Pitt