Tuesday, June 07, 2005

A congressman with guts

Here's a statement by Rep. John Conyers, Jr. entitled, "Did Bush deliberately deceive America about Iraq?". His conclusion is "yes". Here's an excerpt:

Essentially, the question boils down to what lawyers call "mens rea". Before a defendant can be convicted of a crime the judge or jury must find not only that the defendant committed the wrongful act but also did so with a state of mind indicating culpability. In the case of a fraud, the jury must find that there was intent to deceive. In the case of Iraq, the weight of evidence continues to accumulate indicating that the American people and Congress may well have been the victims of a deliberate deception.

On page A26 of the Sunday, May 22 edition of the Washington Post, under the headline "Prewar Findings Worried Analysts," we learned that four days before the President made the now retracted claim that Iraq was trying to buy "significant quantities" of uranium from Africa, the National Security Council thought this case was so weak that it put out a frantic call for new intelligence.

In the same article, we learned that before an Oct. 7, 2002 Presidential speech in which the President claimed there was a potential threat to the U.S. by Iraq through unmanned aircraft "that could be used to disperse chemical or biological weapons," and a contemporaneous claim to Congress by Vice President Cheney and then-CIA Director George Tenet that this was the "smoking gun" justifying the war, " the CIA was still uncertain whether the [source of the information] was lying."

Conyers then goes on to tell us that, far from being held accountable for their failures, analysts who pushed questionable intelligence were rewarded for doing so. He concludes this way:

Early this morning on the Associated Press wire, under the headline "Bolton Said to Orchestrate Unlawful Firing," we learn that the President's nominee to be Ambassador to the United Nations once again exercised his unique diplomatic talents, flying "to Europe in 2002 to confront the head of a global arms-control agency and demand he resign, then orchestrated the firing of the unwilling diplomat in a move a U.N. tribunal has since judged unlawful, according to officials involved." The diplomat,s sin? He was "trying to send chemical weapons inspectors to Baghdad. That might have helped defuse the crisis over alleged Iraqi weapons and undermined a U.S. rationale for war."

Thus, absent any contradictory evidence, in the past two weeks alone (leaving out the reports of the last three years), we have a pretty clear pattern. This Administration had a cover story, namely that a clear and present danger to the United States was posed by Iraq's WMD, for something they knew they wanted to do: go to war with Iraq. Those who brought forward the weight of evidence disputing these claims were first ignored and later punished. Those who assisted in the cover story were rewarded.

Sounds like the intelligence and facts were being "fixed" around the policy, as the Downing Street Minutes claim. That sounds like deliberate deception to me.

Sounds like it to me too. It's refreshing, to say the least, to read the words of a Democrat with spine. John Kerry was supposed to have raised the issue of the Downing Street memo on the senate floor yesterday. To my great disappointment, he cancelled his appearance. Why, I don't know. Let's hope he had a good reason.


  1. Anonymous12:43 PM

    If you want to lend Rep. John Conyers, Jr. assistance in his push for answers from President Bush about the Downing Street Memo, go to www.johnconyers.com At the bottom of the home page click on "Letter to President Bush concerning the Downing Street minutes". It will take you to a letter with a list of questions for the administration on which he is trying to gather electronic signatures. Here is someone who is very much trying to do something about this and all he is asking for in assistance is the time it takes to file an electronic signature. This is our chance to do something. Carolyn

  2. I'm glad you mention this, Carolyn. I had already done this but I didn't think to post the information on the blog here. Thanks!


New policy: Anonymous posts must be signed or they will be deleted. Pick a name, any name (it could be Paperclip or Doorknob), but identify yourself in some way. Thank you.